![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
After a tiresome day, I was just climbing in bed when I decided to check my email. Upon reading this, I changed my mind and decided to try some of my Finnish roommate's handmade (with a hammer, strangely enough) Molotov cocktail. And I was just starting to think those lazy referees had forgotten all about the paper we submitted!
Re: Manuscript Code Number - XXXXX
Titled: Finite size scaling of the correlation length above the upper critical dimension in the five-dimensional Ising model
by Jeff L. Jones and A.P. Young
Dear Dr. Young:
We are pleased to inform you that the above manuscript has been accepted for publication as a regular article in Physical Review B. We would also like to bring the enclosed referee comments to your attention.
Sincerely,
Peter Adams
Editor
Physical Review B
Email: prb@aps.org
http://prb.aps.org/
* * * * * * * * * * * *
The authors made several modifications in the paper. In the new version, besides some clarifications of theoretical details, they rule out the possibility of logarithmic corrections to FSS in d=5 supporting the existence of non-standard FSS above the upper critical dimension and implicitly the assumption that these relative small systems can provide conclusive numerical data. The study was originally well-planned and clearly presented; therefore, with the inclusion of the above mentioned additional considerations, which were suggested in the referee reports, I recommend publication in Physical Review B.
Re: Manuscript Code Number - XXXXX
Titled: Finite size scaling of the correlation length above the upper critical dimension in the five-dimensional Ising model
by Jeff L. Jones and A.P. Young
Dear Dr. Young:
We are pleased to inform you that the above manuscript has been accepted for publication as a regular article in Physical Review B. We would also like to bring the enclosed referee comments to your attention.
Sincerely,
Peter Adams
Editor
Physical Review B
Email: prb@aps.org
http://prb.aps.org/
* * * * * * * * * * * *
The authors made several modifications in the paper. In the new version, besides some clarifications of theoretical details, they rule out the possibility of logarithmic corrections to FSS in d=5 supporting the existence of non-standard FSS above the upper critical dimension and implicitly the assumption that these relative small systems can provide conclusive numerical data. The study was originally well-planned and clearly presented; therefore, with the inclusion of the above mentioned additional considerations, which were suggested in the referee reports, I recommend publication in Physical Review B.
