I think the way you're framing your inquiry reflects a very imperialistic bias.
"And in the end, it turns out that it's really not that much." According to your own source, you're saying $700,000 in debt for each and every American family 'is really not that much'?
And why would you automatically think the solution is for the worker to take a pay cut? I think this also indicates strong cultural bias. From the sound of it, your experience in academia has cut you off from working class experience.
And why is the discussion framed around what a company would want to do? Since when is that a valid frame of social organization?
no subject
"And in the end, it turns out that it's really not that much." According to your own source, you're saying $700,000 in debt for each and every American family 'is really not that much'?
And why would you automatically think the solution is for the worker to take a pay cut? I think this also indicates strong cultural bias. From the sound of it, your experience in academia has cut you off from working class experience.
And why is the discussion framed around what a company would want to do? Since when is that a valid frame of social organization?