ext_74472 ([identity profile] easwaran.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] spoonless 2010-03-07 10:41 pm (UTC)

Not having read this particular discussion about the connection between EMH and P=NP, I would have thought that EMH was much stronger. Just as you can come up with market problems that are NP-complete, it seems to me that you should be able to come up with non-Turing-computable market problems, so that full efficient markets would be required to solve uncomputable problems. Perhaps there's a natural way to reduce the logical strength needed by weakening the EMH, but I should think about this.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting